By: Freak4Dell
T-Mobile will do great as a value carrier, just like they have been so far. T-Mobile understands that they belong in the value market, and they're taking excellent steps to advance in that position.
View ArticleBy: DCMAKER
I am referring to down the road......If they own 70% of Sprint and turn the company around in 4 years with pulling a yearly profit and boost subscribers than they could sell that company easy for 2-3...
View ArticleBy: Freak4Dell
That's certainly possible. However, when the company's value goes up, so does the amount of money you'd have to pay to buy it. It's not going to be easy to find a buyer looking to drop that much cash....
View ArticleBy: DCMAKER
the public would be buying their shares. If the price goes from 7-21 in 4 years they can easily sell off their 70% over the course of a year without ruining share price
View ArticleBy: DCMAKER
Also thats why i am personally more tuned to the idea of a US corporation buying up and investing into sprint because it could end up keeping 60 billion US dollars in the US market and not Japan....
View ArticleBy: Freak4Dell
No, I was under the impression that only one entity could own 70% of a company. Yes, of course I know it doesn't have to be a single buyer. That still doesn't mean Softbank can just dump the company...
View ArticleBy: DCMAKER
true true. It would have been smart for a US company to buy or any company to buy sprint wen it was at 2.xx dollars. Its at 5 bucks now...or 7. Not sure if prices jumped that high after announcement....
View ArticleBy: Ismael Rodriguez
I'm all for the deal. The U.S. has been lagging behind in mobile data speeds and standards. I'm hoping that having an outsider with their experience can improve that situation for Sprint and force...
View ArticleBy: qu4ttro
boohoo...AT&T can stick it in their collective arses. Theres a reason I moved to Sprint this year after almost 15 years as a customer.
View ArticleBy: DCMAKER
alright i typed the first sentence wrong and i have read over it 10 times and can't remember what i was thinking...oh well. Maybe speed is the same is they used the spectrum or speed eh whatever...
View ArticleBy: DCMAKER
my only worry is about the money going to be stripped out of our country and brought to Japan :/
View ArticleBy: warcaster
Aww..poor AT&T. They might get to have some real competition now, and they already started whining. They are free to buy carriers from other countries, just like Softbank did.
View ArticleBy: spydie
I don't see the difference. Sprint sucks and has for years, on top of being a company that loses $900 million a year because they don't know how to run a business or get their network working. I used...
View ArticleBy: David Ruddock
Yep, that's true. Figured we were talking carriers here - thought that was kind of implied.
View ArticleBy: Cody Toombs
Good info on the spectrum openings, I hadn't heard most of that. It's impossible to disagree about the pending death of CDMA, the shift to LTE pretty much ensures that CDMA will become an increasingly...
View ArticleBy: Cody Toombs
Just for reference, the same thing happens in reverse frequently. In Mexico, it's not legal for a non-Mexican citizen to own property, but non-citizens can create a company which can own property....
View ArticleBy: bedwa
At&t doesn't see Sprint/Clearwire as a current threat due to lack of funds/global influence, whereas Softbank will have the funds to invest and global influence to push for better global roaming...
View ArticleBy: Freak4Dell
You're right. Sprint sucks. The whole point of this buyout is to try and make them not suck again (yes, there was a time when they didn't suck). However, if you seriously think that having AT&T and...
View ArticleBy: Freak4Dell
Softbank can't afford to do that. Sprint doesn't make a profit right now, and hasn't in ages, so there's no money to take back to Japan. The only choice Softbank has here is to pump money into Sprint...
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....